Epifungium ulu
(Pilsbry, 1921)
Description:
Dimensions range from 2 mm - 145.8 mm high and 1 mm - 6 mm wide.
Width to height ratio: 0.5:1 ~ 0.04:1
Shell: elongate conical; fragile, thin walled, easily shattered; microscopic to large. Exterior colour white, creamy white. About 16.25 whorls; protoconch with 3.24-3.5 whorls glassy; teleoconch with 8-12.75 whorls convex, rapidly enlarging. Suture deep, moderately deep. Umbilicate: very narrow or closed. Approximately 15 - 39 costae on the body whorl. Costae are delicate, unevenly spaced, threadlike. Costae not continuous. Intercostal spaces spiral threads which vary in strength on each whorl. Interstices with approximately 9 - 25 spiral striae per whorl. Aperture subcircular, rather trapezoidal, lip slightly reflected below; outer lip narrowly reflected. Operculum paucispiral.
E. ulu differs from E. hoeksemai by a length/width ratio of ca. 2.6 instead of ca. 1.9 and by the presence of fewer than 20 spiral threads on the fifth teleoconch whorl. It is the most common epitoniid species associated with Fungiidae.
Distribution:
Hawaii, New Guinea, northern Red Sea, and the Maldive Islands [DuShane, 1990:5]; Seychelles, Thailand, Philippines, Indonesia, and Palau [A. & E. Gittenberger, 2005:197]; North Queensland, Australia [Loch, 1988:3]
Habitat:
Intertidal to 35 m. Coral hosts include Fungia spinifer Claereboudt & Hoeksema, 1987, F. scabra Döderlein, 1901, F. concinna, F. horrida Dana, 1846, F. scruposa Klunzinger, 1879, F. fungites, F. granulosa Klunzinger, 1879, F. scutaria Lamarck, 1801, F. moluccensis Van der Horst, 1919, F. gravis Nemenzo, 1955, and F. paumotensis Stutchbury, 1833 [Gittenberger et al., 2000]. In Hawaii it is associated with the solitary coral Fungia scutaria Lamarck, 1801 [DuShane, 1990:5]. Loch [1982:3] also reported it under Fungia actiniformis Quoy & Gaimard, 1833, at depths of 1.5-45 m.
Etymology:
not given
Type Material:
Holotype ANSP 127818, from type locality. for Epifungium ulu (Pilsbry, 1921) - Type Locality: USA, Hawaii, Hilo.. [Gittenberger, A., Goud & Gittenberger, E., 2000]

Pilsbry, H. A. (1920). pp: 376. Fig. 11c.
Distribution
as listed in source literature





